Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Polygamy Blog
Nate Carlisle
Reporter Nate Carlisle and photographer Trent Nelson cover polygamy for The Salt Lake Tribune. You can follow the Polygamy Blog on Twitter at @tribunepolygamy. Follow Nate Carlisle on Twitter at @natecarlisle. Follow Trent Nelson on Twitter at @trenthead.

» E-mail Nate Carlisle

» Subscribe (RSS)




Kody Brown, right, with "sister wives" Christine, left, Meri, Robyn and Janelle. The Brown family says Utah's bigamy statute is unconstitutional and is suing the state. (Courtesy Joe Pugliese for TLC)
State comes back swinging in Sister Wives case

Government attorneys forcefully defended the state’s right to outlaw polygamy today in their latest motion in the "Sister Wives" case.

(You may remember how they got slammed by the federal judge at the last hearing in this case).

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Pointing to abuses reported within the Warren Jeffs-led FLDS, the Kingston group, and, yes, the Sister Wives’ AUB, Assistant Attorney General Jerrold Jensen wrote "the practice of polygamy is harmful to society" and the law "protect[s] women and children."

Friday’s motion also draws a legal line between private sexual relations and the institution of marriage. The Sister Wives want the law struck down, and they are basing their argument primarily on the legal right to privacy, the same principle that struck down Texas’ sodomy law criminalizing homosexual relationships in the landmark Lawrence v. Texas case.

"Lawrence is not about marriage," the motion read. "It is about adults engaging in private, consensual sexual activity. Lawrence does not grant or even begin to breach the subject of a fundamental right to have multiple, simultaneous marriage partners."

A couple more choice quotes from the motion:

• "Utah’s bigamy statute merely draws the line at the number of spouses a person may have at any one time…it does not interfere with the fundamental right to marry, prohibit anyone from marrying, nor does it intrude on the right to choose one’s marriage partner."

• "As a function of its police powers, a state legislature makes value judgments about a whole host of things."

Read the motion for yourself. What do you think?



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
 
Jobs
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.