Attorneys for the "Sister Wives" filed their latest court sally today, pushing a federal judge to rule in their favor and decriminalize polygamy.
The document attacks the state for not specifically responding to their numerous claims, the most important of which is that Utah’s polygamy ban violates their constitutional right to privacy.
It’s true that government attorneys have so far been mainly focused on getting the suit dismissed for lack of standing. I’m interested to see them get into a more detailed defense of the law when their turn to file comes up Sept. 28. A hearing in the case is scheduled for January.
Canada, by the way, wrapped up a case last year on whether their polygamy ban was legal, and compiled an exhaustively fascinating document trove. Read it here. The case ended with a judge deciding it was constitutional due to "sundry harms" to women and children.
Read the latest filing in the Sister Wives case here.
|1.||Scott D. Pierce: A dozen TV shows you can stop watching|
|2.||‘Fit Mom’ Maria Kang, not yet over self, claims fatties are out to get her|
|3.||Ancient DNA from human relative sets age record|
|4.||Recipes: 5 all-star holiday cookies from our archives|
|5.||Sundance adds children’s movies to 2014 line-up|
|6.||You won’t believe the secret to this picture of Morgan Freeman|
|7.||Sundance Film Festival unwraps a fierce 2014 competition slate|
|8.||Booze generates millions for Utah economy, study says|
|9.||Making a TV Christmas specials list, checking it twice|
|10.||Provo Tabernacle video shows building’s transformation into Mormon temple|