So it looks like we're going to see arguments on whether Utah's law banning polygamy is unconstitutional in the "Sister Wives" case, maybe as soon as this fall.
That's after a federal judge ruled in the Brown family's favor today, allowing the case to go forward even though Utah County prosecutors have promised they won't go after them, or any other consenting adults who don't commit other crimes.
And the blog-response from Brown attorney Jonathan Turley here.
The state's response is in my story, here.
The next step in the process will come from the Browns, with a filing due Aug. 31. The deadline for a reply from the state is Sept. 14, and a rebuttal from the Browns is due Sept. 28.
I'm interested to see the state's direct response to the Browns' arguments that the law violates their rights to privacy, freedom of expression, etc. So far the state has been mainly been focused on trying to get the suit tossed.
Maybe they'll take a page from Canada's recent court case over their polygamy law? (It was upheld). Page through the vast trove of documents filed in that case here.
|1.||Chefs share tips for home cooks to waste not, want not|
|2.||Restaurant review: Flavor and style — for a Park City price — at Burgers and Bourbon|
|3.||Owner of dog shot by Utah police turns down $10,000 offer|
|4.||Annual liquor sales in Utah up $20 million|
|5.||Bagley Cartoon: Comic Con Controversy|
|6.||Salt City Vodka now available in Utah liquor stores|
|7.||Paul Rolly: Blogger fired from language school over ‘homophonia’|
|8.||BYU Football: Ranking the top-10 players of all-time|
|9.||Ordain Women, abuse, defections on tap for Mormon symposium|