So it looks like we're going to see arguments on whether Utah's law banning polygamy is unconstitutional in the "Sister Wives" case, maybe as soon as this fall.
That's after a federal judge ruled in the Brown family's favor today, allowing the case to go forward even though Utah County prosecutors have promised they won't go after them, or any other consenting adults who don't commit other crimes.
And the blog-response from Brown attorney Jonathan Turley here.
The state's response is in my story, here.
The next step in the process will come from the Browns, with a filing due Aug. 31. The deadline for a reply from the state is Sept. 14, and a rebuttal from the Browns is due Sept. 28.
I'm interested to see the state's direct response to the Browns' arguments that the law violates their rights to privacy, freedom of expression, etc. So far the state has been mainly been focused on trying to get the suit tossed.
Maybe they'll take a page from Canada's recent court case over their polygamy law? (It was upheld). Page through the vast trove of documents filed in that case here.
|1.||Blood found on teen arrested in deaths of 2 adopted brothers|
|2.||Secret recording: Mark Shurtleff offers $2 million to silence critic|
|3.||Weekend Express: 11 things to do in Utah on Memorial Day weekend|
|4.||Alleged cop killer Matthew Stewart hangs self in jail cell|
|5.||A first: GOP lawmaker calls for Utah A.G. John Swallow to resign|
|6.||Does Costco save you money?|
|7.||Watch Amanda Bynes get arrested in NYC on marijuana charge (VIDEO)|
|8.||Red Rock Hot Club to play Downtown Farmers Market fundraiser|
|9.||Intermarriage debate divides Jewish rabbis; is Mormon model a remedy?|