At the Sister Wives hearing today (story here), U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups seemed to be picking apart Utah's unique approach polygamy, which generally boils down to this: Bigamy is a felony, and it should stay that way. But if you're a polygamist who otherwise keeps your nose clean, we'll leave you alone.
Prosecutors want to keep the law on the books by pledging to enforce it only when someone has committed another crime. But why?
There are several practical reasons avoid going after consenting adults: It would be too expensive. Attorneys don't have time. There are bigger fish to fry, both within and outside the state's polygamous communities, and they want to build trust of people in those communities. It's politically unpopular. They don't want to get sued.
But Waddoups seemed to want an answer that would speak to the larger public policy, and maybe even moral, reasons for that position. He didn't get it from Assistant Attorney General Jerrold Jensen.
It's hard to predict how judges will rule. Sometimes the side they question the most closely is the one they end up agreeing with. But Waddoups seems ready for a full hearing on whether Utah's bigamy law is constitutional, something he said is important to a lot of people.
After all, to quote Jensen:
"Let's all admit it," he said. "It's a pretty interesting issue."
|1.||Bagley Cartoon: Comic Con Controversy|
|2.||Chefs share tips for home cooks to waste not, want not|
|3.||Restaurant review: Flavor and style — for a Park City price — at Burgers and Bourbon|
|4.||Prayers answered? Keep it to yourself|
|5.||Owner of dog shot by Utah police turns down $10,000 offer|
|6.||Annual liquor sales in Utah up $20 million|
|7.||Salt City Vodka now available in Utah liquor stores|
|8.||Ordain Women, abuse, defections on tap for Mormon symposium|
|9.||Salt Lake, San Diego comic con name feud would set precedent|
|10.||Is a fee for solar energy users a ‘sun tax’ or fair play?|