I'm no expert, but the fact that a hearing has been set in the "Sister Wives" case seems like a score for the polygamous reality show stars.
I thought Utah County prosecutors might have dealt their case a death blow last month when they said they wouldn't file bigamy charges against the polygamous Browns.
Without bigamy charges or even the "credible threat" of some future charges, it looked like the Browns might've lost legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of Utah's bigamy law.
So if the judge wants to hear arguments at all, it seems like a win for their side.
What do you think?
|1.||Utah teacher to stand trial on charges of sex with second boy|
|2.||Utah to BLM: Rein in your cops|
|3.||Fall TV preview: The best and worst of fall TV|
|4.||Salt Lake Airport seeks to break up monopoly|
|5.||BYU football: Virginia linebacker says Taysom Hill will win the Heisman|
|6.||Mountain lion caught near homes in Salt Lake City|
|7.||After Darrien Hunt shooting, Utah’s black, biracial families worry|
|8.||Prep football: Is Jordan QB Austin Kafentzis Utah’s best ever?|
|9.||Scott D. Pierce: 13 returning TV faves to watch this week|
|10.||Kirby: What if I had two Moms — or two Old Mans?|