I'm no expert, but the fact that a hearing has been set in the "Sister Wives" case seems like a score for the polygamous reality show stars.
I thought Utah County prosecutors might have dealt their case a death blow last month when they said they wouldn't file bigamy charges against the polygamous Browns.
Without bigamy charges or even the "credible threat" of some future charges, it looked like the Browns might've lost legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of Utah's bigamy law.
So if the judge wants to hear arguments at all, it seems like a win for their side.
What do you think?
|1.||Utah’s alternative to Medicaid expansion still stalled|
|2.||Idaho seizes boys from Utah polygamous sect|
|3.||Luxury fashion takes on wearable fitness technology|
|4.||Judge finalizes ‘Sister Wives’ ruling as both sides prepare for appeals|
|5.||Is nail polish that detects date-rape drugs actually a bad idea?|
|6.||Food briefs: Salt Lake has worst tippers, survey says|
|7.||Detectives crack 1991 Utah murder mystery|
|8.||Consumers want Utah liquor stores to offer better hours|
|9.||Restaurant review: Rye rocks in space next to Urban Lounge|