I'm no expert, but the fact that a hearing has been set in the "Sister Wives" case seems like a score for the polygamous reality show stars.
I thought Utah County prosecutors might have dealt their case a death blow last month when they said they wouldn't file bigamy charges against the polygamous Browns.
Without bigamy charges or even the "credible threat" of some future charges, it looked like the Browns might've lost legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of Utah's bigamy law.
So if the judge wants to hear arguments at all, it seems like a win for their side.
What do you think?
|1.||WikiLeaks’ Assange talks NSA, hints at more leaks|
|2.||Paul: Court young voters with privacy focus|
|3.||Colorado uses humor in campaign against stoned driving|
|4.||Utah polygamous family says going on TV liberating|
|5.||Utah city won’t file charges over risque T-shirts|
|6.||Connecticut could be 1st state to curb loud movies|
|7.||LDS leader tells Mormons to embrace their history, keep their faith|
|8.||Satirical musical ‘The Book of Mormon’ set to play Utah theater|
|9.||Utah cockfighters say sport is tradition, not inhumane|
|10.||NBA: For James, Cleveland trip was to support Ilgauskas|