Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
The Polygamy Blog
Jim Dalrymple II and Trent Nelson
Reporter Jim Dalrymple II and photographer Trent Nelson cover polygamy for The Salt Lake Tribune. You can follow the Polygamy Blog on Twitter at @tribunepolygamy. Follow Jim Dalrymple II on Twitter at @jimmycdii. Follow Trent Nelson on Twitter at @trenthead.

» E-mail Jim Dalrymple II

» Subscribe (RSS)




Should polygamy in Mitt Romney's family tree be an issue?

As Mitt Romney closes in on the Republican nomination for president, there's been some conversation about the history of polygamy in his family. The families of many native Utahns, politicians included, have at least some history of polygamy, but Romney's family took it a bit further than the rest of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. His paternal great-grandfathers lived in Mexico and continued the practice after the church abandoned polygamy in 1890, according to a story we ran in 2006. Both men had multiple wives.

That was his family's last generation to practice polygamy, however. Mitt's grandfather had a single wife, as did his father.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

He won't be the only candidate with a history of polygamy in his family, though. This Washington Post story details the plural marriage on Barack Obama's father's side, where his great-grandfather and his grandfather had multiple wives.

I've heard far less about the plural marriage in Obama's family history, maybe that's because there's already been controversy over his birth and upbringing.

But it also makes me wonder if the conversation about the polygamy in Romney's family tree is a way of talking about his LDS faith — not necessarily popular in the evangelical community.

Romney spoke publicly about his family history Friday, something he does rarely, in response to the Montana governor's comments that it could be problematic during the election.

So here's my question: Should it matter? Does it bother you? Do you think he should he address it further, or is it far enough in the past that it's no longer important?



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
 
Jobs
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.