The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision announced Monday, stated that there is no constitutional right for people to obtain public records from states they don’t live in
.According to the Reporters’ Commitee for Freedom of the Press, the high court upheld a provision in Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act that states non-residents cannot file records requests.
"This Court has repeatedly made clear that there is no constitutional right to obtain all the information provided by FOIA laws," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court.
The suit was brought by Mark J. McBurney and Roger W. Hurlbert. McBurney, a former Virginia resident who moved to Rhode Island, attempted to obtain information on child-support payments from his ex-wife. Hurlbert, a California businessman, was seeking property-tax records for his business.
The pair are planning to lobby Virginia to repeal the residents-only clause in its records act.
The Society of Professional Journalists and other open-government groups filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting the pair’s lawsuit.
|1.||Lindsey, Burke address internet photo issue|
|2.||In Utah, Mormon chapels are here, there and everywhere|
|3.||Utah school district settles with family of boy who killed himself|
|4.||They did, then they did again. Clooney and wife do No. 2 ‘I do’|
|5.||LDS meeting: Feminists seeking change find it in subtle wording|
|6.||Utah Jazz: Trey Burke apologizes for leaked nude photographs|
|7.||Where in Utah was this photo taken? Email your guess to email@example.com for a chance to win a book|
|8.||Poll: Utahns evenly split as Supreme Court considers gay marriage|
|9.||Violent assault ruled out in death of Utah family, but not foul play|
|10.||Trib Talk: AP U.S. history test scrutinized|