The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision announced Monday, stated that there is no constitutional right for people to obtain public records from states they don’t live in
.According to the Reporters’ Commitee for Freedom of the Press, the high court upheld a provision in Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act that states non-residents cannot file records requests.
"This Court has repeatedly made clear that there is no constitutional right to obtain all the information provided by FOIA laws," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court.
The suit was brought by Mark J. McBurney and Roger W. Hurlbert. McBurney, a former Virginia resident who moved to Rhode Island, attempted to obtain information on child-support payments from his ex-wife. Hurlbert, a California businessman, was seeking property-tax records for his business.
The pair are planning to lobby Virginia to repeal the residents-only clause in its records act.
The Society of Professional Journalists and other open-government groups filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting the pair’s lawsuit.
|1.||Waterless subdivision in Saratoga Springs spurs criminal charges|
|2.||BYU football: Cougars blow lead in 42-35 loss to Nevada (with video)|
|3.||Utah Jazz: Lakers beat Jazz as fringe players fight for roster spots|
|4.||BYU football: Plenty of blame to go around for Cougars’ collapse (with video)|
|5.||Federal sage-grouse workshop’s access criticized|
|6.||Kirby: Meet the Mormons: The prequel|
|7.||BYU football: Coaches say Cougars most deserving of power conference admission|
|8.||New Utah report cards: Too complex to hand to parents|
|9.||Utah football: Utes rise to No. 19 in AP, coaches polls|
|10.||Market turmoil: A gift for mortgage refinancers?|