The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision announced Monday, stated that there is no constitutional right for people to obtain public records from states they don’t live in
.According to the Reporters’ Commitee for Freedom of the Press, the high court upheld a provision in Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act that states non-residents cannot file records requests.
"This Court has repeatedly made clear that there is no constitutional right to obtain all the information provided by FOIA laws," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court.
The suit was brought by Mark J. McBurney and Roger W. Hurlbert. McBurney, a former Virginia resident who moved to Rhode Island, attempted to obtain information on child-support payments from his ex-wife. Hurlbert, a California businessman, was seeking property-tax records for his business.
The pair are planning to lobby Virginia to repeal the residents-only clause in its records act.
The Society of Professional Journalists and other open-government groups filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting the pair’s lawsuit.
|1.||Bingham High students walk out over school dance dress code|
|2.||Utah teacher to stand trial on charges of sex with second boy|
|3.||Utah to BLM: Rein in your cops|
|4.||Prep football: Is Jordan QB Austin Kafentzis Utah’s best ever?|
|5.||Fall TV preview: The best and worst of fall TV|
|6.||Salt Lake Airport seeks to break up monopoly|
|7.||Cougar released back into the wild after Salt Lake City adventure|
|8.||BYU football: Virginia linebacker says Taysom Hill will win the Heisman|
|9.||Scott D. Pierce: 13 returning TV faves to watch this week|
|10.||After Darrien Hunt shooting, Utah’s black, biracial families worry|