What does Arkansas decision mean for adoption in Utah? | LGBT FYI | The Salt Lake Tribune
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
LGBT FYI
Rosemary Winters
LGBT FYI is a blog about the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. Rosemary Winters covers education and LGBT issues for The Salt Lake Tribune. Since joining The Tribune in 2003, she has written about small business, global warming, city governments, sexuality and Utah's involvement in California's Proposition 8. During the 2009 legislative session, she outed former Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. -- as a supporter of civil unions.

» E-mail

Subscribe (RSS)

» Older blog posts




What does Arkansas decision mean for adoption in Utah?

Within an hour of the news that the Arkansas Supreme Court had overturned a state law that banned unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children, Utahns were calling the American Civil Liberties Union office to see what the ruling means for them.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The Arkansas law, approved by the state’s voters in 2008, was patterned after Utah’s, says Darcy Goddard, legal director of the ACLU of Utah.

"They assumed Utah’s law would be litigation proof. And they were wrong," Goddard says.

But that doesn’t mean a challenge to Utah’s law could succeed just yet, Goddard notes. (The state ruling in Arkansas does not affect Utah’s statute.)

The Arkansas ruling relied on a legal precedent that does not exist in Utah. In Arkansas, courts have said that the right to privacy in the state’s constitution includes the right of individuals to engage in private, consensual sex without government intrusion. (Unlike Arkansas, Utah’s anti-sodomy laws stayed on the books until the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated such statutes in 2003 with Lawrence v. Texas.)

The Arkansas adoption law, Associate Justice Robert L. Brown wrote in the Arkansas Supreme Court’s opinion issued on April 7, conditions the "fundamental right" to engage in private, consensual sexual activity on forgoing the privilege of adopting or fostering children.

"The choice imposed on cohabiting sexual partners, whether heterosexual or homosexual, is dramatic," Brown wrote. "They must choose either to lead a life of private, sexual intimacy with a partner without the opportunity to adopt or foster children or forego sexual cohabitation."

In Utah, a similar legal precedent may need to be in place for a challenge to the state’s adoption law to be successful, Goddard says, "but it is definitely a call to arms for Utahns to start building the basis in case law."



Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
 
Jobs
Shopping
Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.