Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Meanwhile, on the Internet
Tribune Reporters
'Meanwhile' is a collaborative blog about all the crazy stuff on the Internet. Here, reporters from various Tribune desks tell you what you (almost) need to know about topics ranging from technology to YouTube sensations. Contributors: Jim Dalrymple, Vince Horiuchi, Michael McFall, Dave Newlin, Matt Piper, Brennan Smith, Erin Alberty. Edited by Sheena McFarland.

Subscribe (RSS)




This image released by Netflix shows Kevin Spacey, left, and Molly Parker in a scene from "House of Cards." The second season of the popular original series premieres on Friday, Feb. 14, 2014 on Netflix. (AP Photo/Netflix, Nathaniel E. Bell)
Our greatest shows, like ‘House of Cards,’ are about power and terrible people

The second season of Netflix’s "House of Cards" premiered Friday and ignited the Internet. Among other things, the show about politicians and journalists battling for supremacy trended on Twitter, sparked dozens of think pieces and even prompted a top-read story at The Tribune.

All of which raises a question: Why do stories about the brutal pursuit of power appeal so much right now? Why do we love stories of deplorable characters who stop at nothing for more influence?

House of Cards tells the stories of politician Francis Underwood (Kevin Spacey), reporter Zoe Barnes (Kate Mara) and other members of the elite political class in Washington D.C. All of them are amoral at best — some are downright evil — and they’re cold, conniving and vindictive to boot.

But the show isn’t alone in it’s preoccupation with powerful but despicable people. Much like the Netflix hit, HBO’s "Game of Thrones" — a fantasy story set in a medieval-esque world — is explicitly about deeply flawed and often selfish characters working toward dominance. The setting, characters and narrative are wildly different from "House of Cards," but the preoccupation is very nearly identical: power.

And then there’s AMC’s recently wrapped "Breaking Bad." It’s a show about a drug dealer, yes, but it’s really about a powerless man building his empire — just like "House of Cards" and "Game of Thrones." Other shows, like "Mad Men" and "Boardwalk Empire," coat these themes in a varying degrees of narrative patina, but power dynamics are always still there. Even the ever-diminishing "Downtown Abbey" plumbs the friction between those with power and those without.

This isn’t entirely new — stories about power and depravity are as old as stories themselves — but the sheer number and popularity of shows telling essentially the same story at the same time is remarkable. And this zeitgeist-y TV programming is among the most lauded ever, leading to spirited debates about rise and fall of TV’s latest golden age.

Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Brett Martin, a writer for "The Sopranos," offered one possible explanation for the trend, speculating that in cable dramas characters have more room to be complex. "When you have the time to tell a 13-hour, 26-hour, 39-hour story, when you don’t have to end artificially, that lends itself to serious work," he told The Atlantic last year.

But narrative freedom doesn’t quite explain it the thematic similarities of these shows; after all, they succeed because we keep watching them. We’re the ones who are preoccupied with this stuff.

So perhaps in a world of percentages — the 99, the 47 — we’re preoccupied with the thing we don’t have. I’m reminded here of the idea of subversion and containment, a concept used to explain why the monarchy of Elizabethan England was so keen on plays about dead monarchs. The point is that if people see something on stage, they don’t necessarily need it in real life. Art — whether it’s Shakespeare or "House of Cards" — is a kind of release valve for collective, sociopolitical stress.

That might be it, though I think there could also be something more going on. Remember, most of these power-hungry characters in these shows are also really bad people.

There’s a message there about power and those who have it. Ultimately, I think, these stories tell us that it’s OK if we’re powerless because the kinds of people who have power are deplorable. It’s a reassuring but curious message: I am powerless because I am a good person.

— Jim Dalrymple II

Twitter: @jimmycdii



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
 
Jobs
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.