" ... This is similar to the "net neutrality" battle, fought before the Federal Communications Commission, between those who favor the public highway concept of the Internet and those who want to let the owners of the pipeline charge different prices for different levels of service, creating two, or more, levels of access that would benefit the rich and the connected.
"And those providers are the very people who would just love to see UTOPIA fail. To see it be forced to sell off its assets at fire sale prices, so they could take over service to the most profitable areas, at the greatest possible mark-up, and leave taxpayers holding the bag for their failed dream of a public information super-highway that would belong to everyone. ...
"... UTOPIA might not be long for this world. If it dies, it would be a shame. Such a basic function of modern life should be provided by an outfit that exists to serve its customers, rather than a corporation that exists for the sole purpose of taking people's money away from them and giving it to their stockholders and managers. ..."
— Back broadband with tax exemption — Casper (Wyo.) Star-Tribune Editorial
"Wyoming must be wired.
"Just as roads crisscross the state, creating valuable corridors for commerce and tourism, the state's wire and communication lines are vital to the future of the state's economy.
"That's why we ask that state lawmakers look favorably on a recent request by the Wyoming Telecommunications Association. The group wants the Legislature to OK a sales and use tax exemption, essentially a tax loophole, for the broadband industry on things such as fiber optics, coaxial cabling and wireless towers. ..."
— Searching for Fairness on the Internet — New York Times Editorial
— Staying true to net neutrality — Los Angeles Times Editorial
— Make your voices heard on FCC's plan to limit net neutrality — Seattle Times Editorial
— FCC plan guts net neutrality; open Web needs protection — Boston Globe Editorial
"The unprecedented flow of information on the Internet occurs largely because all sites have equal access to users. The principle is called net neutrality: No Internet service provider can give preference to, or discriminate against, a website by changing the speed at which consumers can access its content. In practice, it means upstart companies can introduce innovative ideas without first gaining the favor of broadband firms like Comcast, Verizon, or AT&T.
"In January, though, a federal judge struck down Federal Communications Commission rules enforcing net neutrality. Proposed new regulations championed by FCC chairman Tom Wheeler won't fix the damage; they'd do the opposite, by allowing companies to pay broadband providers for faster transmission of their own content. ..."