A lot of editorials out there about the controversial return of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. This first one, from a newspaper very near his hometown, may be the best.
— Demonizing the Bergdahls — Twin Falls (Idaho) Times-News Editorial
"The rush was on to blast the White House last week and congressional Republicans couldn't care less who got hurt. But the fact that Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and his parents, Bob and Jani, were the collateral damage in the GOP's ruthless campaign to lampoon President Obama is vile. ..."
— There is no litmus test on bringing home an American soldier — St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial
" ... Sgt. Bergdahl might be a quitter. For those on the right side of the political spectrum, those who wanted the president to do anything in his power to bring the American soldier home right up to the time when he did, it's an accepted article of faith. Sgt. Bergdahl walked away from his base and into the hands of the waiting Taliban. His father's long beard, grown in solidarity with his son the prisoner of war, is being pointed to as some sort of evidence of nefarious intent. Apparently, long beards on gay-bashing reality TV stars are OK. Dads growing them as a modern-day version of the yellow ribbon? Not so much. ..."
— It's time to focus on Bergdahl's freedom — Robert Ehlert | The Idaho Statesman
"Though our posture at times has been to never negotiate with terrorists or the enemy, that is a black and white rule that ignores all the gray reality smothering and shrouding the bitter truths of war. Does such negotiation make Americans higher targets as hostages? That is a What-If world. Bergdahl was a captive in this world. ..."
— Investigate Bergdahl thoroughly — Ogden Standard-Examiner Editorial
" ... Bergdahl is a U.S. soldier. In this nation, we do everything we can to bring our soldiers home. We're glad he was returned. That five Taliban leaders were freed in negotiations to bring Bergdahl home serves as evidence that we place a higher value on life than do our enemies in Afghanistan. Now that Bergdahl is safe, there needs to be a thorough investigation as to the circumstances of his capture and his behavior leading to it. If it is determined that evidence exists that he deserted, then he should be charged and face a military trial. If evidence exonerates him, he should be left in peace. ..."