Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Pundits and wonks on new carbon limits ...
— A chance to lead the way on climate change — Salt Lake Tribune Editorial
"Utah has been presented with an opportunity to lead, truly lead, on a matter of global importance for generations to come. All we have to do is seize the moment.
"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Monday announced a new set of standards aimed at significantly reducing the amount of carbon dioxide American power plants pour into the atmosphere every year. It is a step that is necessary in order to head off a future where we see the planet heat up and the quality of life driven down, here and around the world. ...
" ... Utah will be expected to lower its per-kilowatt/hour carbon emissions by some 27 percent, slightly less than the national average of 30 percent, from its 2005 levels by the year 2030. And it has many ways, including some low-hanging fruit, to accomplish that goal.
"It can adopt the most recent energy-efficiency standards in its uniform building codes. It can push its existing power plants to be more efficient.
"Most important, Utah could fully embrace its potential for renewable energy sources, solar and wind, which could save money, create jobs and make the Beehive State a globally recognized example of how forward-thinking communities finally give up their addiction to dirty and doomed fossil fuels and move to the energy sources of the future. ..."
— Utahns react to EPA call for cutting power plant carbon emissions 30% — Salt Lake Tribune
" ... Environmental groups and public health advocates flooded the airwaves and Internet with praise for the 645-page proposed rule, which faces a year of public comment and revision.
"The plan gives states latitude in crafting their own plans to achieve these reductions, yet pro-business critics were quick to blast it as 'pure fantasy' that would snuff out thousands of jobs.
" 'It's just another example of more expensive, big-government regulation, and less freedom for American businesses and American families,' said Utah's Rep. Chris Stewart, a Republican whose 2nd District covers southwest Utah and Salt Lake City. 'The costs of this new regulation will be paid for by you and me in the form of increased power bills, fewer jobs, a decrease in the manufacturing sector, and more expensive energy efficient products.' ... "
— A huge majority of Americans support regulating carbon from power plants. And they're even willing to pay for it. — The Fix | The Washington Post
Guess we know who did and didn't watch "Cosmos" last night.
— Remember when Republicans believed in climate change — Ezra Klein | Vox.com
— The EPA's emissions plan should be just the beginning — Washington Post Editorial
"The Obama administration has finally rolled out its centerpiece climate change policy. It is a praiseworthy, solid step, taken in the face of withering opposition. Even so, it is not enough. ..."
— Less Carbon, More Energy — The New York Times [interactive graphic]
— Here are the newspapers that think you're an idiot — Jonathan Chait | New York