"Chances that Ivory and Lockhart will rake in campaign contributions and delegate votes while they pursue this futile crusade are enormous. And that is what it all means. No translation necessary."
I swear, I didn't know what Gehrke was writing. And he didn't know what I was going to be on about.
— Utah Rep. Ken Ivory's quest for state control of public lands is all-consuming — Robert Gehrke | The Salt Lake Tribune
"It's a big idea — trying to get the federal government to relinquish hundreds of millions of acres of public land to states. And for Utah Rep. Ken Ivory, it's become an all-consuming crusade. It dominates his work as a part-time legislator and has taken over his private life, too. It's how he makes his living. ..."
— Regional history speaks to importance of public lands — Thad Box | For The Logan Herald-Journal
" ... History also tells us that public lands, properly managed, strengthen communities near them. Neither states, corporations nor individuals can take public land from we-the-people without an act passed by the U.S. Congress and signed by the president of the United States. We can picnic by a mountain stream and thank our fellow co-owners back east for contributing their taxes for our pleasure."
— Wildfire danger begs for better preparation — Casper Star-Tribune Editorial
" ... As a result of failures on multiple fronts, Wyomingites and their fellow Westerners will greet the summer with heightened foreboding this year. Their livelihoods will rest on a wing and a prayer – or rather, fewer wings and lots more prayers."
Meanwhile, the Deseret News Sunday opinion section had four pieces on the public lands issue:
— Chris Stewart: The deficit of trust between America and our government
— Willie Grayeyes: Preserving our shared public lands
— Phil Lyman: The BLM hasn't kept its own rules
— Scott Miller: The public interest in public lands