— Bundy doesn't merit conservative support — Robert Robb | The Arizona Republic
" ... The amount of land the federal government retained when Western states were admitted to the union might be unfair or unwise, but the argument that it was illegal has no grounding whatsoever. To graze on federal land, ranchers have to pay grazing fees. That's the law. ..."
— Western land standoff aside, there is room for compromise with BLM — Deseret News Editorial
" ... Some of these voices want the BLM to completely step aside and give all the land back to Utah.
"Those who take this position are overlooking that state management itself won't necessarily be all that different from federal management. Would the governor of the state of Utah, if the federal lands were under his control, allow unrestricted cattle grazing or energy exploration in sensitive wilderness areas? ..."
— BLM prevented from doing its lawful work in Nevada standoff — Dennis McLane | For The Idaho Statesman
" ... The BLM has been conducting lawful cattle trespass activities since the passage of the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934. Prior to that act, grazing on the public domain lands was unregulated and free. But overgrazing, conflicts over who could graze where, and conflicts between sheep operators and cattle operators all led up to a need for Congress to act. ..."
— A Nevada cattle rancher rustles up a Western land grab — Lance Dickie | The Seattle Times
" ... Bundy is the fellow the Bureau of Land Management has determined to be an aggressive freeloader, who has used federal grazing land for decades without paying fees. A string of federal court findings reached the same conclusion.
"Following what appears to be standard procedure, Bundy has made a virtue of his refusal to pay up. ..."