Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Editorial Dreams/Legislative Reality ...
Deja vu all over again?
Interesting that Utah House Speaker Becky Lockhart would complain that the Senate wasn't willing to give her idea for a high-tech makeover of Utah public schools any more than "change out of the couch cushions."
That's a good description of what the Legislature — under Lockhart's leadership — has been able to cough up for public education over each of the last several years.
— 'Extra' school funding wasn't nearly enough — Tribune Editorial, 2/12/14
" ... The additional revenue legislators funneled to education last year sounds like a lot of money — especially when politicians want credit for being champions of schools and kids — and it is. But those hundreds of millions don't get spent on teacher training or higher pay for excellent teaching, for smaller classes or more help for struggling students, as Tribune reporters discovered. It simply maintained the status quo. ..."
Some other issues just keep coming up:
— Campaign gifts — Tribune Editorial, 10/7/10 [Yes, 2010]
" ... Politicians who claim that they are not influenced by campaign contributions are not being honest with themselves. It is basic human nature to feel an obligation to someone who gives you a gift. Donors know that, which is why they contribute. ..."
"Utah will remain one of only four states that have no campaign-donation limits. The House killed the latest attempt to create them on Monday. ..."
— Disorderly conduct — Tribune Editorial, 2/24/12
" ... This bill begs the question whether openly carrying a gun in a public place is, by itself, disorderly conduct. We think it is, for the simple reason that it will cause fear, if not panic, among many people who see this behavior.
"Why is that guy carrying a gun? What does he intend? I should call the cops. Those are the thoughts that will dart through the mind of most onlookers. Does it disturb the peace of these people? Absolutely. ..."
"Carrying a gun may look ominous. But the House voted Monday to make clear that such action alone cannot be considered disorderly conduct. ..."
On the other hand, some good news: