Division of Wildlife Revenue?

Published October 2, 2006 12:00 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2006, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Is it Division of Wildlife Resources or Division of Wildlife Revenue? What is really more important to the DWR, managing wildlife or making money?

In the DWR's latest mule deer management plan, written in 2003, they state one of the goals is to “expand and improve mule deer populations.” Objective No. 1 is to increase the statewide population to 320,000. Objective No. 2 is to increase buck/doe ratios.

Their strategies to meet these objectives include shortening the hunting seasons, weapon restrictions and vehicle access management.

Why doesn't their strategy include closing the hunt entirely, or closing some hunting areas? It has worked in the past. Money! $6 million is the amount of money the DWR gets just from the sale of general season deer permits. With this amount of money involved, is it any wonder why they will not close the hunt or cut the number of permits sold?

With current population virtually unchanged since this plan was put into place and current estimates around 290,000 far from the goal, isn't it time for a plan that will work?

Erik Stromberg


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus