Salt Lake Tribune
Weekly Ad Specials
Daylight-saving cost
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2008, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Congress extended daylight-saving time by one month to conserve energy. Last March, a Tribune editorial concurred with this misguided notion ("Daylight saving: Springing forward early makes energy sense," Our View, March 12, 2007). The opposite has happened.

An April 5, 2007, USA Today article cited U.S. Energy Department figures that a 3 percent increase in gasoline consumption occurred last March compared to the previous two years on standard time. If it's light another hour in the evening, more people will be out driving their cars, consuming this non-renewable resource.

Then just last month The Wall Street Journal cited a University of California, Santa Barbara, study that showed residential electricity soared 4 percent in Indiana after daylight-saving time was imposed on that state last year because of increased air-conditioning use in the evening. The study also found that the lower use of electric lights in the evenings in March was offset by people using their heaters longer on cool mornings. So much for saving energy.

If daylight-saving time causes higher gasoline consumption and increased air-conditioning usage, shouldn't we abandon it altogether?

Jack Duffy

West Jordan

Article Tools

 
Affiliates and Partners