Poor symphony review
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2010, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

I must respond to Catherine Reese Newton's review of the recent Utah Symphony concert ("Symphony Rachs on," Tribune , Jan. 9). To call Rachmaninoff's Symphony No.2 gooey is beyond my understanding. Has Newton never heard music that has moved her to her very soul? That's what I feel when I hear a piece of beautiful, overpowering music, such as that played Friday night. It was obvious that the audience felt the same as I did. It was plain that the young girl sitting with her parents not far from me wasn't finding the piece gooey. What is wrong with loveliness and sublime beauty?

It's reviews such as this that discourage rather than encourage attendance at the symphony, especially when the Utah Symphony is struggling more than ever. The job of a critic is to comment on how well the orchestra plays, not to impose her narrow views on us.

Kaye D. Murdock

Salt Lake City

Article Tools

Enter a search phrase.

Specify a Range

From  to

 

 
Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.