Font ResizeWashington » The selection of the U.S. Military Academy for President Obama's announcement of his new Afghanistan war strategy is media manipulation.
What better setting than an audience of military cadets to project Obama as the reluctant warrior and commander in chief who, because of circumstances not of his making, is forced to commit the nation's finest to a war not of his choosing?
It's also a good way for Obama to get his war message across to national security think-tankers who have been banging their spoons for escalation, to Republicans who demand that he give the generals what they want, and to conservatives who say he is a ditherer, not a doer.
Tonight's event should go down well with the cadets. But what about the millions of Americans across the country who will be tuned in?
Many will be older and grayer than the cadets, and they are past the point of being impressed by dramatic photo ops and symbolic poses. They don't want orchestration; they want answers.
That's certain to be true of jobless viewers. The nation's unemployment rate is at 10.2 percent, a 26-year high. These people will be waiting to hear Obama explain how adding to the $10 billion monthly price tag for Iraq and Afghanistan will help them find work.
The White House has said that every increase of 1,000 troops will cost $1 billion. So sending 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan, as rumored, is an
"Where's it going to come from, Mr. President?" the unemployed and their families will want to know. Obama needs to address that question. This country has an accumulated debt of $12 trillion that is forecast to rise to $21 trillion in 10 years.
Picturesque events that help shape Obama's image can take him only so far. He needs to explain his Afghanistan strategy to the people who must pay for this war: the earners who struggle to buy food and pay their bills.
True, most of the folks who will watch tonight are not schooled in military strategy and tactics. But they heard the president tell Chinese students in Shanghai last week that "the greatest threat to the United States' security are the terrorist networks like al-Qaida." And they are asking, "If that's so, why is Obama choosing Afghanistan as the place to declare America all-in?" Or to, as the president put it, "finish the job"?
They know that al-Qaida is an international terrorist organization out to destroy the U.S. The Sept. 11 attacks, the bombing of the World Trade Center, and the bombings of American embassies and the USS Cole all speak to that. They also know that al-Qaida is waging global jihad, launching plots in Europe.
They want to know whether denying al-Qaida a base in Afghanistan will secure America against attacks. That is what Obama seems to think. But what happens if, in the face of a U.S. escalation in Afghanistan, al-Qaida moves its terrorist network to Pakistan or beyond? Will U.S. forces follow?
Washington's intelligentsia may know the answer. The rest of the country should know, too. Obama is accountable to the men and women who hired him, not to his war council, Washington think tanks or editorial pages.
And that gets us to a fear that is growing among some of the president's most ardent supporters: that Barack Obama, the fresh, think-outside-the-box leader brimming with energy and new ideas, has entered the White House and gone native.
Suspicion is spreading that Obama has lost some of the character that made him special; that he has taken on the ways of this town, thinking in conventional terms dictated by a brain trust and self-serving, entrenched Washington interests that make this city go 'round.
That development, if true, would be as disastrous to the Obama presidency as a military miscalculation.
