Efforts to restrain panhandlers are a distraction from a tragic reality ("SLC ready to curb panhandling," Tribune , Aug. 7). If a viable "safety net" existed, panhandling could be easily dismissed.
It's no coincidence that the issue resurfaces during the worst economic times in 75 years. Many households cannot survive today. Though panhandlers can become inconvenient for shops, tourists and any of us minding our "own business," an ordinance to protect "sidewalk cafes, street vendors, churches, ATMs, bus and train stops and people waiting in lines" is misdirected. We are all struggling in this economy, and demonizing panhandlers while avoiding the underlying problems is the easy and unproductive way out.
Efforts to assist pedestrians to be assertive -- to say, "I do not have anything for you today" -- would better serve everyone. Although the mayor's office has "a steady stream of complaints" about panhandlers, why, among everything facing our community, does this topic gain traction? With the cutting of programs for children, the poor and disabled, why isn't there a movement to ban poverty?
It's time for education and compassion, not apprehension!
Patrick Poulin Former director, Travelers Aid Society
Salt Lake City



Font Resize