Mayors knock Chaffetz on earmarks stance

Published August 7, 2009 4:23 pm
Pork » Locals say philosophy punishes them, rewards districts that play the game.
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2009, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Utah County mayors aren't happy with their new congressman's no-earmarks stance because they say it's costing them federal dollars to build roads for their growing population.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, has shunned congressionally directed project spending as pork, and one of his staffers explained to local officials this week that his boss will target money only at projects with a clear federal purpose.

Elected officials who plan transportation as members of the Mountainland Association of Governments vented their frustrations over that position.

"What is he actually doing for us?" Pleasant Grove Mayor Mike Daniels asked rhetorically.

Daniels and other mayors on the association's regional-planning committee agreed that both of Utah's Republican senators -- and even Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson, whose district includes a sliver of Utah County -- "fight for funding."

"The last place I'm going to take [a funding proposal] to is Congressman Chaffetz," Daniels told Chaffetz staffer Mike Jerman.

For his part, Jerman said Chaffetz will direct some money to projects, but only when there is a "federal nexus."

"Is there a federal justification for [a project]?" he said, characterizing the congressman's test. For instance, "Is it aiding interstate commerce?"

Chaffetz prefers, Jerman said, that any federal transportation grants be funneled through state transportation departments for prioritization.

"We still need to have Congress more concerned about how federal dollars are spent," Jerman added.

Chaffetz was touring Israel with a group of Republican House members Friday and did not respond to a phone message.

After Thursday's meeting, Daniels called Chaffetz's position "noble" but a hindrance to Utah County planning for its own growth. Orem Mayor Jerry Washburn, the regional planning committee's chairman, said being a lone holdout against earmarks is unrealistic.

Neither mayor would specify projects each wanted funded, but both said Chaffetz has rebuffed a list of Mountainland requests.

"Earmarks are a fact of life," Washburn said.

Ultimately, even if Chaffetz gets some money for the Utah Department of Transportation, other funds that he could have earmarked would be lost, Washburn said. "They'll go to another state."

"It's like unilateral disarmament," said Mountainland senior planner Shawn Seager. Just because Chaffetz halts earmarks doesn't stop other representatives from steering funds to their districts.

The projects that Mountainland submits for directed funding already, Seager said, are vetted by UDOT when the association writes its prioritized improvement plans.

bloomis@sltrib.com" Target="_BLANK">bloomis@sltrib.com



Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus