After the narrow vote, House Republicans jaunted up to the White House Rose Garden to celebrate their triumph with President Donald Trump, who mugged for cameras and hailed the historic occasion. After all, it's not every day the House passes a bill that would:
• Drive up premiums for low- and middle-income families and increase premiums for those over age 40 by as much as 30 percent.
• Allow insurers to refuse to cover or limit coverage for maternity care, hospitalizations and prescription drugs.
• Slash more than $880 billion from coverage for low-income Americans.
• Eliminate caps that provide the last defense for families facing catastrophic illnesses.
And, yes, despite the spin, it would allow insurers to charge thousands of dollars a year more to individuals with pre-existing conditions like pregnancy, cancer, asthma, diabetes and many others — not denying coverage, but making it unaffordable.
According to a recent report from the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, 23 percent of Utahns under age 65, close to 400,000 people, have pre-existing conditions that could be the basis for jacking up premiums.
Depressed yet? Don't be.
You see, depression is one of those pre-existing conditions that could cost you drastically more and that insurers would no longer be required to cover.
An analysis of an earlier version of the bill by the Congressional Budget Office projected that the GOP plan would cost 24 million Americans their health insurance. This time, Republicans were in such a rush to pass the bill — breaking their own pledge to release all legislation at least two days before any votes — that we don't understand the full impacts.
Frankly, I'm not one of those who gets upset about members of Congress not reading the bill because I'm convinced that, even if they read it, they would need it explained to them.
And, really, you don't need to read it to know the bill they backed is an absolute unworkable mess.
Ask Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, one of 13 members crafting the Senate's bill, who said: "Unfortunately, that bill contains numerous fatal procedural flaws and much of it will have to be rewritten. In fact, it will probably have to be re-envisioned entirely."