Quantcast
Home » News

UTA canceled promised bonuses of $474K and $375K for two officials

First Published      Last Updated Apr 25 2017 12:53 pm


Public money » One was for selecting — not completing — five “transit-oriented developments.”

A few years ago, the Utah Transit Authority caused a public outcry by giving $30,000 bonuses to some top executives — on top of their other compensation totaling more than $300,000 a year each.

It turns out that was small potatoes.

Contracts would have given former President and CEO Michael Allegra a $375,189 bonus in 2015 — and an even bigger one, for $474,646, to former UTA General Counsel Bruce Jones.

In the wake of an immunity deal for the agency with federal prosecutors investigating former and current transit officials, UTA is now talking about how it managed to cancel the bonuses.




"That amount was shocking to us," says Jayme Blakesley, who replaced Jones as UTA's general counsel in 2015 (when Jones retired as general counsel but continued for a time as the agency's president of government resources).

Blakesley was hired after a legislative audit blasted high bonuses — of the $30,000 variety — and high executive salaries. He said former UTA board Chairman H. David Burton asked him to review contracts with Allegra, Jones and others.

Their contracts included deferred bonuses — payable after several years, or essentially when the pair retired — that used some hard-to-follow formulas, Blakesley said. When UTA accountants calculated their worth, he said, "I about fell out of my chair."

Allegra's "performance incentive" bonus of $375,000 was for "completion of the 2015 program of projects [to expand TRAX and FrontRunner lines] on time and under budget," Blakesley said. "To the extent you can find any comfort in a figure like this, that was a task that required real work and real effort over a sustained period of time."

The bigger bonus for Jones was based on much less, he said.

"Bruce's was for selecting five transit-oriented-development projects — not completing them — picking them," Blakesley said.

Such projects aim to develop offices, apartments and retail around rail stations to attract more transit ridership, and UTA has sought development partners to use land it owns.

"Many of those contracts have been the source of other problems," Blakesley said, "as we have learned through the [legislative] audit, the federal investigation and our own efforts to try to get a handle on what all those things have meant."

The audit, for example, criticized several sweetheart deals with developers and said many deals may never have brought any return to the agency for its investment.

After UTA subsequently reviewed contracts for the 12 such projects it had in the works, Blakesley said the agency attempted to cancel or get out of all of them — but five had proceeded too far or had legal complications that prevented cancellation.

Jones disputes Blakesley's descriptions. He said it is "a misconception that the bonus was for naming five projects. It's far more comprehensive than that."

He said it involved long negotiations with city officials, the UTA board, developers, lenders and engineers — and "hundreds and hundreds of hours of meetings with all those people and developing site plans and financial plans" before the board itself approved the five projects.

Jones said the deferred bonus was also structured to increase in value over time to encourage his longevity "for a period of time to allow those projects to come to fruition."

Blakesley said he found that Jones' contract also included a clause to give him two years' worth of credit for every year worked toward retirement benefits. He said he found UTA would need to pay an extra $242,929 to fund that.

» Next page... Single page

 

COMMENTS
VIEW/POST COMMENT      ()