Though neither SUWA nor Bloch have a legal interest in the case, Lyman pointed out in his motion that SUWA urged prosecution against him in the first place and that Bloch attended the trial. Lyman added that SUWA joined other conservation groups in writing a letter to the court advocating for "punishment [that] reflects the egregiousness of [Lyman's] crimes."
The letter in question was sent to the probation officer responsible for making a sentencing recommendation, according to Bill Hedden, executive director for Grand Canyon Trust, which joined the letter.
It appears that letter helped sway Shelby to recuse himself, according to his decision. The recusal "will promote confidence in these proceedings and avoid even the appearance of impropriety in connection with the court's sentencing duties," his decision reads.
Judges often recuse themselves from cases in which they are close to one of the parties.
Lyman and co-defendant Monte Wells, who both face up to a year in prison and $100,000 in fines, were to be sentenced Sept. 15. The sentencing judge will also determine whether to stick Lyman with a $172,302.70 bill for damage the BLM alleges protest riders caused, according to the motion. Lyman's supporters say that damage assessment was trumped up.
They argue Lyman is innocent because the BLM lacked the authority to close the road leading into the canyon, and that the closure was not valid at the time of the protest. In a pretrial ruling, Shelby declared that the canyon was properly closed.
Now, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes is investigating whether the road segment entering the canyon was legally closed and whether it should be included in the state's RS 2477 lawsuits seeking title to 12,500 other routes. And Gov. Gary Herbert intends to divert $10,000 from his re-election campaign to Lyman's defense — even though at the time of the 2014 rally, he had urged protesters to obey the law.
mmcfall@sltrib.com
Twitter: @MikeyPanda
JOIN THE 
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.