Stratton is pushing his colleagues to add more money to get expert legal advice and galvanize support outside Utah.
In the three years since Utah enacted the Transfer of Public Lands Act, no other Western state has traipsed into the states rights fight. Meanwhile, Utah's deadline for the federal government to hand over the land has passed.
At the same time, lawmakers have not spelled out how the state would manage lands currently administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service.
A Utah County grower, Stratton is fond of orchard analogies when talking about laying the groundwork for the public land transfer, which he sees as a multi-year process.
"We are not trying to take back the land. You can't take back something that was never yours," Stratton said. "It's an issue of appropriately and in a timely way transferring the control of the public lands to what's going to be the best for the state and the people here and for the country."
Under the state contracts offered up this week, the money will not be used to actually litigate the issue, but to help determine the most effective legal arguments and identify legal counsel and expert witnesses to take these arguments to court.
The contract for legal services requires the contractor to make recommendations and submit "a legal brief on legal strategies (taking into account cost and other factors) that the State of Utah may use to obtain ownership and control of public lands."
The non-legal component of the RPF is geared toward developing public relations campaigns to build political support for land transfer and forging coalitions with other Western states.
Both two-year contracts will be awarded June 19.
Conservationists across the West denounce public land transfer as an unconstitutional "seizure" and "land grab" intended to open up vast landscapes to extractive industries and motorized access without regard to natural values.
But proponents say their goal is to allow the states to restore the land and rural economies they allege have been damaged by failed federal policies.
One public lands commission member, Salt Lake City Democratic Sen. Jim Dabakis, a staunch transfer opponent, has lost patience with the debate and is urging his colleagues to press on with a lawsuit, preferably as a petition for original jurisdiction before the nation's highest court.
"Let's get the big enchilada case before the Supreme Court. Let's stop piddling around with this. Let's get a decision and move on with our life," Dabakis said Monday on the Senate floor. "For once and all, come down and say these lands belong to Utah or they could say, 'Utah, dream on. You're not going to get it.' We are going to be able to end this eternal lawsuit."
Dabakis was arguing in support of his own bill, SB105, which would direct the attorney general to file suit by June 30, 2016.