This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2017, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Richmond, Va. • A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld the 3 1/2 year prison sentence for a former CIA officer found guilty of leaking government secrets to a reporter.

A three judge panel of the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed all but one of Jeffrey Sterling's convictions and said there was no need for the man to be resentenced.

Sterling was convicted under the Espionage Act in 2015 after being accused of divulged details to New York Times journalist James Risen of a CIA mission aimed at stalling Iranian ambitions to build a nuclear weapon.

The operation, described in Risen's 2006 book "State of War," involved using a CIA agent nicknamed "Merlin" to deliver flawed nuclear blueprints to Iran in the hopes that they would spend years trying to develop a product that would never work.

Citing anonymous sources, Risen suggested it was a reckless and botched operation that may have actually helped advance the Iranians' nuclear program. The CIA has strongly disputed that idea.

The 4th Circuit said prosecutors failed to prove that the transfer of a letter detailing information about the program from Sterling to Risen began or happened in the Eastern District of Virginia — where the man was prosecuted.

But the court rejected Sterling's other arguments and said a "rational jury could have found that Sterling passed along at least some classified information about the program to Risen, who then approached the CIA shortly afterwards."

Judge William Traxler Jr. wrote that he would have upheld all of Sterling's convictions.

Sterling can ask the full 4th Circuit to hear the case. His attorneys didn't immediately respond to phone messages seeking comment on Thursday.

The former CIA officer has maintained that he wasn't Risen's source. His attorneys argued that the CIA only charged Sterling because Risen's story made the CIA look foolish. They say the leak likely came from a Capitol Hill staffer after Sterling shared his concerns about the program with staffers at a Senate intelligence committee in 2003.

After spending years trying to force the reporter to reveal his source, and despite the 4th Circuit's order compelling him to testify, Risen was never directly asked in court whether Sterling was his leaker.

In the end, prosecutors obtained enough circumstantial evidence by seizing their emails and phone messages to win a conviction.

The government did not have recorded phone calls or emails showing the actual exchange of classified information. During a December hearing, prosecutor Eric Olshan pointed to an email Risen wrote Sterling in 2004, which said "I want to call today. I'm trying to write the story ... I need your phone number again."

Prosecutors argued that Sterling provided the information to Risen in retaliation for multiple grievances he had against the agency. Sterling had unsuccessfully sued the agency for racial discrimination and was upset that the CIA had blocked him from putting certain information in his memoir, prosecutors said.

Sterling's prison sentence currently expires in 2018, but his wife said last year that he may be released as early as this December if he maintains good behavior.

————

Follow Alanna Durkin Richer at http://twitter.com/aedurkinricher. Read more of her work at http://apne.ws/2hIhzDb