Home » News

Gov. Herbert to Utah Legislature: Forget special session

First Published      Last Updated May 18 2017 10:37 pm

Election » Utah governor says he has power to set procedure, wouldn’t fear legislators’ lawsuit.

Gov. Gary Herbert says he has all the legal power needed to call and set procedures for a special election to replace retiring U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz — and will not bend to pleas from the Legislature to call it into a special session to write such rules.

He also said he's not concerned that House Speaker Greg Hughes, R-Draper, and others say they may sue him for breaking election laws if he speeds or alters normal processes in any way without lawmakers' approval.

"I don't worry about it," Herbert said at his monthly KUED news conference. "If we have conflicts, disputes and disagreements, the courts can clarify that. And I suspect in this case it would be a very timely, expedited process."

Under Utah law, the governor has sole authority to call a special session of the Legislature, with the one exception of a veto-override session.

Herbert and the Legislature are at odds largely because the governor wants to ensure that special election candidates have the opportunity to qualify for the ballot by collecting signatures. He also wants 3rd Congressional District voters — not just party delegates — to choose Chaffetz's replacement.

Lawmakers talk instead about allowing some 1,000 state delegates in the district to pick their party nominee, or even appoint Chaffetz's successor.

Herbert said he opposes such an exclusive process. "By the Constitution, this is an election. This is not an appointment. Therefore, the Utah voters must have access to the ballot if it's going to be an election."

While legislators say they should be called into special session to write specific rules for a special election, Herbert said, "We have statutes in place that tell us what we should be doing," and past legislators gave governors flexibility on how to do that.

Utah law says simply that to fill a vacancy for a U.S. House member, "The governor shall issue a proclamation calling an election to fill the vacancy."

Herbert said while current lawmakers may now want to create more specific rules, past legislatures wrote laws recognizing "there should be latitude given to the executive branch" by not including specifics — and he intends to use that flexibility.

"I want to correct the narrative … that the Legislature has somehow not had a say," he said. "They have. They've had a number of years in fact to address it and modify."

In fact, the Legislature in its session earlier this year debated a measure to set rules for a special election to the U.S. House, but the bill died.

Hughes, the House speaker, issued a statement pointing to the U.S. Constitution and federal law in insisting that the process for elections is a responsibility of the legislative branch.

"This is a separation of powers issue. The House and Senate majority caucuses are unanimous in their support for a special session," said Hughes, adding that Democrats also have spoken up in favor of the Legislature's involvement.

The statement said Hughes "remains committed to defending the legislative process and calls on Governor Herbert to convene a special session of the Legislature to vote a clearly defined process into law."

Senate President Wayne Niederhauser also issued a statement pointing to federal law on elections and supporting a special session.

"The path forward with the least amount of legal risk would be for the governor to call a special session to allow lawmakers to add appropriate election language to the state code," he said.

Herbert said that special sessions usually are called only when unanimity on an issue exists, and "we don't even have consensus with the legislators on what to, in fact, pass in a special session."

» Next page... Single page