"I firmly believe that, to protect the personally held values of people on all sides of this issue, any advancement of non-discrimination legislation should be coupled with legislation to safeguard protections to religious freedom," the governor said.
Numerous other states have considered religious-liberty legislation. It became law in Mississippi; the governor of Arizona vetoed the bill.
Herbert also took aim at a familiar target, asserting that Utah is better able than the federal government to find solutions for providing health care, educating children and managing public lands.
"We will never back away from the challenge that every state in America faces today — the constant overreach of the federal government," Herbert said. "If states fail to stand up and speak out for the right to self-determination, we will lose that right to an ever-expanding federal bureaucracy."
But, Herbert said, the state is at Washington's mercy when it comes to health care. With the passage of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, Utahns will pay nearly $800 million in taxes each year.
He said his proposed Healthy Utah plan, which would use federal Medicaid money to subsidize insurance for about 100,000 of the state's poorest residents, is the best way to recoup some of that money, maintain some local control and help those in need find work.
"The choice before us is stark: We can either watch our hard-earned tax dollars remain on the table in Washington, D.C., primarily benefitting other states, or we can bring back a significant amount of our own money to Utah to be spent on Utahns," Herbert said.
Utah is one of seven states that have yet to make a decision on whether to expand Medicaid coverage to provide health care to those not currently covered making up to 138 percent of the poverty level, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation.
But Herbert's plan has little support in the Republican-dominated Legislature, with legislative leaders concerned about the long-term costs and sustainability of the plan. A legislative task force recommended a much more modest state-based plan that would cover up to 16,000 Utahns deemed medically frail or suffering from mental illness or addiction.
House Majority Leader Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, said he has had "frank discussions" with Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox and the governor's staff on the issue.
"The problem here is not the governor and the Legislature coming together. It's the federal government giving us such stringent requirements," Dunnigan said.
If the Obama administration would cover the costs to insure just those below poverty — with those up to 138 percent of poverty qualifying for federal subsidies — they would agree, Dunnigan said. But the administration won't do that.
Senate President Wayne Niederhauser said only covering the medically frail leaves a large group without coverage, but the state would actually have to pay more to cover those up to the poverty level than it would up to 138 percent of poverty.
"We hate the idea of expanding to 138 percent, but maybe there are some benefits to that plan," Niederhauser said.