Netflix has challenges on path to ‘Internet TV’ dominance
Outlook • Corporate raider bets on a rebound, but some analysts, investors remain skeptical.
Published: November 10, 2012 04:27PM
Updated: March 6, 2013 11:32PM
image
FILE - In this Oct. 11, 2007 file photo, private equity investor Carl Icahn speaks at the World Business Forum in New York. On Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, Netflix announced it is moving to protect itself against hostile takeovers, less than a week after activist investor Carl Icahn disclosed that he has accumulated a stake of nearly 10 percent in the online video company. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, file)

Depending on whom you ask, Netflix is either a company that’s poised for a remarkable resurgence or a washed-up has-been whose best days are behind it.

While both sides have a legitimate case to make, corporate raider Carl Icahn is betting on a rebound.

While they’re at odds with Icahn, Netflix’s managers — and some analysts — are optimistic about the company’s prospects. The company is basically inventing what it calls “Internet television,” getting smarter about how it operates and is investing in international markets to position itself for long-term growth.

“Internet TV is the future of television, and we are leading the charge,” Reed Hastings and David Wells, Netflix’s chief executive and chief financial officers, respectively, said in a letter to shareholders.

But other analysts and investors question Netflix’s long-term prospects and its ability to ever resume the heady growth it recorded for much of the past decade. They see a company struggling to control the costs of its streaming business while letting its older but highly profitable DVD business wither away.

Netflix’s management is very clear about the company’s strategy, “but I don’t think it’s a good one,” said Michael Pachter, a financial analyst who covers the company for Wedbush Securities, adding that he sees only two paths ahead: It’s either going to be “a high-growth, unprofitable business or a low-growth profitable one.”

The future prospects of the streaming video company have been much debated in the wake of Icahn’s move last week to take a 10 percent stake in the Los Gatos, Calif., company. Icahn said Netflix was undervalued and could be worth more if it were sold to another company. Other investors seemed to agree — or at least hoped that Icahn’s involvement could juice the stock — and Netflix shares soared immediately after.

Netflix’s shares have been in the dumps since last year when the company stumbled through a succession of setbacks. It angered users with a price increase and a later-aborted attempt to sever its DVD business. Then it turned off investors by announcing an aggressive international expansion that would depress profits. More recently, the company further aggravated investors by failing to sign up subscribers at the robust rate it predicted at the beginning of the year.

For optimists, the company’s struggles are simply an indication of the challenging task the company has taken on: transforming its business from a largely subscription DVD service focused on the United States market to an international streaming video provider. They see a company that is positioning itself well in that new market.

Apps to watch Netflix videos are available on a range of devices — from smart TVs to tablets to game consoles — that its competitors can’t match. Netflix subscribers are spending increasing amounts of time watching video through the service. And the company’s content partners are starting to recognize the value Netflix gives them by offering an audience for their older movies and television shows, analysts said.

“When I look at the assets the company has, they are substantial,” said Colin Dixon, a senior partner at The Diffusion Group, a technology research firm. “Having so many clients on so many devices gives them a substantial advantage over any other player in the market.”

But critics question the company’s strategy. Since retreating from its move to split off its DVD business, Netflix has allowed that service to decline rapidly. In the last year, the service has lost more than a third of its subscribers, and its quarterly revenue has fallen by $100 million over the last three quarters.

That decline is notable because even today — when it has nearly three times more U.S. subscribers to its streaming business than DVD subscribers — the DVD business still produces 40 percent more profit than its domestic streaming service.

Meanwhile, Pachter and others see huge challenges for Netflix on the streaming front. Netflix owes $5 billion in coming years to Hollywood studios for the movies and TV shows it offers. Although that amount plateaued in the recent quarter, it skyrocketed early last year, and analysts warn that it could jump in the future.