9/11 mastermind wants a uniform for Gitmo trial
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed • The accused terrorist asks for a camouflage field jacket, camouflage turban with traditional Pakistani clothing.
Published: June 13, 2012 01:02PM
Updated: June 13, 2012 01:06PM
image
FILE - This undated photo downloaded from the Arabic language Internet site www.muslm.net and purporting to show a man identified by the Internet site as Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the Sep. 11 attacks, is seen in detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. A new book says Justice Department prosecutors were stunned to learn three years ago that the U.S. military had secretly tape recorded incriminating comments that alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed made to fellow detainees during daily prison yard conversations but was not planning to use them at military tribunals. . (AP Photo/www.muslm.net)

San Juan, Puerto Rico • The man who has called himself the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks is seeking to wear military-style clothing at his upcoming war crimes trial in Guantanamo, one of his attorneys said Wednesday.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has asked to wear a camouflage field jacket and camouflage turban with traditional Pakistani clothing as he goes on trial with four other men at the U.S. base in Cuba on charges that include murder and terrorism.

Mohammed wanted to wear the items at his May 5 arraignment but prison officials refused to allow it. They also rejected some clothing requested by other defendants as inappropriate for the military tribunal.

But his defense team is asking the judge to overrule that decision, arguing in newly released court papers that Mohammed is seeking to wear items customarily worn by members of a militia and that it violates his right to a fair trial and historical precedent by forbidding him to do so.

“He’s being prosecuted for violating the laws of war in the context of hostilities,” said Army Capt. Jason Wright, a member of Mohammed’s Pentagon-appointed defense team. “War crimes defendants during the Tokyo and Nuremberg tribunals apparently had a right to wear military-style clothing, and it’s unlikely that the U.S. had a problem about Mr. Mohammad’s particular clothing when he was part of the U.S.-backed mujahadeen in Afghanistan who fought the Soviets.”

The defense also argues that denying him the right to wear the clothing of his choice is attempt to break him down psychologically, a continuation of the harsh interrogation, including being waterboarded 183 times, that he endured in the CIA’s clandestine prison system before he was brought to Guantanamo in September 2006.

“This appears to be another attempt by the U.S. government to continue one of the aims of the CIA’s now-condemned torture program as an attempt to psychologically disintegrate these so-called enemy prisoners from their individual and social personalities,” Wright said in an interview.

Mohammed and his four co-defendants could receive the death penalty if convicted of charges that include nearly 3,000 counts of murder for their alleged roles orchestrating and aiding the Sept. 11 attacks. Mohammed has previously stated he was the “mastermind” of the attacks and indicated he would plead guilty but he and his co-defendants have not yet entered pleas in the case.

Their May arraignment dragged on for nearly 13 hours as the men refused to respond to questions from the judge and wouldn’t listen to Arabic translations in a protest that seems to have been sparked by the military’s refusal to allow the clothing of their choice.

Defendant Walid bin Attash, who also wanted to wear a camouflage field jacket, was placed in a restraint chair at the start of the hearing. Another of the men, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, had sought to appear in an orange jumpsuit similar to those worn by the first prisoners who were brought to Guantanamo and which are now often worn by protesters around the world at demonstrations calling for the closure of the prison.

“Mr. Hawsawi wished to wear the orange prisoner jumpsuit as a silent reminder of Guantanamo’s legacy of torture and in peaceful defiance of a system that is built to kill,” said his lawyer, Navy Cmdr. Walter Ruiz.

In a legal motion released Tuesday, prosecutors ask the judge in the case not to overrule the prison camp officials who deemed the clothing items unsuitable for sessions of the court, known as a military commission.

“The detainee’s attire should not transform this commission into a vehicle for propaganda and undermine the atmosphere that is conducive to calm and detached deliberation and determination of the issues presented and that reflects the seriousness of the proceedings,” the prosecutors wrote.

The detention center commander, Rear Adm. David B. Woods says in an affidavit accompanying the motion that he forbids “excessive clothing” for security reasons because it could allow prisoners to hide contraband more easily or make it harder for the guards to gain control if necessary.

Woods also says the prison forbids “clothing that is inconsistent with the decorum and dignity of a court proceeding whether in the United States or the Middle East, and which could undermine good order and discipline.”

Lawyers for the defendants say that camouflage should not conflict with the decorum of the court since guards inside the courtroom and prison officials wear military fatigues.

The judge is expected to hold a hearing on the clothing issue at the next court session, scheduled for August.