Last weekend, The Salt Lake Tribune published a small editorial [second of three in this file] lamenting the fact that six-term U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch hasn't found time to debate his rival in the June 26 Republican primary, Dan Liljenquist.
... Claims that he’s too busy now, when voters have an important decision to make, just don’t wash. It is certainly not uncommon for incumbents, especially those with big leads and bigger bank accounts, to avoid debates that would only give their lesser-known rivals more attention. Not uncommon. And not very respectful of the voters. ...
The Deseret News published a BIG editorial, not only expressing displeasure at the lack of debates, but offering, with its corporate brethren at KSL TV to air it on prime-time television.
... Although contemporary political debate can sometimes devolve into demagoguery and sound bites, we do not believe that is how either of these statesmen would approach debate. And frankly we know of no better forum for allowing voters to compare candidates side-by-side, to clarify differences, to evaluate command of issues and to contrast their ability to persuade. ...
Today, Hatch's answer to all that.
One debate. On the Doug Wright radio show, which is on the air from 9 a.m. to noon., some time in late June.
A page, perhaps, from Richard Nixon's playbook? You know, the belief that people who listened to the Kennedy-Nixon debates on the radio thought Nixon won, while those who watched on TV called the match for John F. Kennedy. (Debunked here.)