MONITORING - The Salt Lake Tribune http://www.sltrib.com/feeds/topics/MONITORING News from The Salt Lake Tribune en-us webmaster@sltrib.com (Webmaster) Judge says BLM underreports grazing impacts http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56438188-78/blm-grazing-catlin-project.html.csp <div class="hnews hentry item"> <h4><a class="url entry-title" href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56438188-78/blm-grazing-catlin-project.html.csp">Judge says BLM underreports grazing impacts</a></h4> <img src="http://analytics.apnewsregistry.com/analytics/v2/image.svc/UTSAC/RWS/www.sltrib.com/CAI/56438188#2013-06-12T06:30:08.287-06:00/MAI/sltrib56438188#2013-06-12T06:30:08.287-06:00/E/qa/PC/Basic/AT/HL" style="display:none;" alt="" width="1" height="1"/> <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn">By Brian Maffly</span></span> <span class="source-org vcard"><span class="org fn"> The Salt Lake Tribune</span></span> <h5><span class="updated" title="2013-06-12T06:30:08.287-06:00">Updated Jun 12, 2013 06:30AM MDT</span></h5> <div class ="entry-content">A scathing decision by an administrative law judge has concluded the Bureau of Land Management underreports impacts of grazing leases on Rich County’s 25,000-acre Duck Creek allotment. If the ruling’s reasoning is applied broadly, it could change the way BLM manages grazing on its holdings across the arid West, according to Jim Catlin of Wild Utah Project. “Sound ranching is part of what we need to have local food and sustainable communities,” Catlin said. “Degraded habitat places at risk your ...</div> <h5><a rel="item-license" href="http://www.sltrib.com/pages/privacy"> Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.</a></h5> </div> 56438188@www.sltrib.com Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:30:08 MDT NSA revelations force question: What do we want? http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/56432842-68/government-surveillance-privacy-americans.html.csp <div class="hnews hentry item"> <h4><a class="url entry-title" href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/56432842-68/government-surveillance-privacy-americans.html.csp">NSA revelations force question: What do we want?</a></h4> <img src="http://analytics.apnewsregistry.com/analytics/v2/image.svc/AP/RWS/www.sltrib.com/CAI/56432842#2013-06-08T22:59:38.203-06:00/MAI/sltrib56432842#2013-06-08T22:59:38.203-06:00/E/qa/PC/Basic/AT/HL" style="display:none;" alt="" width="1" height="1"/> <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn">By ADAM GELLER</span></span> <span class="source-org vcard"><span class="org fn"> The Associated Press</span></span> <h5><span class="updated" title="2013-06-08T22:59:38.203-06:00">Updated Jun 8, 2013 10:59PM MDT</span></h5> <div class ="entry-content">New York • For more than a decade now, Americans have made peace with the uneasy knowledge that someone — government, business or both — might be watching. We knew that the technology was there. We knew that the law might allow it. As we stood under a security camera at a street corner, connected with friends online or talked on a smartphone equipped with GPS, we knew, too, it was conceivable that we might be monitored. Now, though, paranoid fantasies have come face to face with modern reality:...</div> <h5><a rel="item-license" href="#license-564328422013-06-08T22:59:38.203-06:00" id="#license-2013-06-08T22:59:38.203-06:00"> Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.</a></h5> </div> 56432842@www.sltrib.com Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:59:38 MDT NSA revelations force question: What do we want? http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/56431055-68/government-surveillance-privacy-technology.html.csp <div class="hnews hentry item"> <h4><a class="url entry-title" href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/56431055-68/government-surveillance-privacy-technology.html.csp">NSA revelations force question: What do we want?</a></h4> <img src="http://analytics.apnewsregistry.com/analytics/v2/image.svc/AP/RWS/www.sltrib.com/CAI/56431055#2013-06-08T17:23:08.149-06:00/MAI/sltrib56431055#2013-06-08T17:23:08.149-06:00/E/qa/PC/Basic/AT/HL" style="display:none;" alt="" width="1" height="1"/> <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn">By ADAM GELLER</span></span> <span class="source-org vcard"><span class="org fn"> The Associated Press</span></span> <h5><span class="updated" title="2013-06-08T17:23:08.149-06:00">Updated Jun 8, 2013 05:23PM MDT</span></h5> <div class ="entry-content">New York • For more than a decade now, Americans have made peace with the uneasy knowledge that someone — government, business or both — might be watching. We knew that the technology was there. We knew that the law might allow it. As we stood under a security camera at a street corner, connected with friends online or talked on a smart phone equipped with GPS, we knew, too, it was conceivable that we might be monitored. Now, though, paranoid fantasies have come face to face with modern reality:...</div> <h5><a rel="item-license" href="#license-564310552013-06-08T17:23:08.149-06:00" id="#license-2013-06-08T17:23:08.149-06:00"> Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.</a></h5> </div> 56431055@www.sltrib.com Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:23:08 MDT