Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Hold the line: Senate shouldn't let automakers weaken mileage standards
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2007, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

The long knives of the auto industry are out to weaken the new fuel efficiency standards in the energy bill now before Congress. But the automakers have resisted any changes in the standard for cars for 18 years, and they should not be rewarded now for belatedly coming to the table with a compromise.

The original bill would increase the fleet average for cars and light trucks to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, plus 4 percent increases each year in the decade after that.

But GM, Ford, DaimlerChrysler and Toyota say that standard will be impossible to meet. So a coalition of senators from auto-manufacturing states has made a counterproposal. They would separate the standards for passenger cars from light trucks. Cars would have to reach 35 mpg by 2022. Pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles would have to get 30 mpg by 2025.

The current standard for cars is 27.5 mpg; for small trucks it is 22.2. Because the standard has remained largely unchanged for so long, American fleets are actually less efficient now than they were in the late 1980s, despite advances in technology.

The motorheads argue that it is unfair to lump cars together with the heavier light trucks, and that doing so will essentially force the big vehicles favored by young families off the market, or at least price them out of the market. The head of Chrysler claims that even the easier standards that the automakers support will add $11.2 billion to his company's costs in the first five years.

We might be more sympathetic to Detroit's argument if it had not been complicit in creating a huge market for SUVs, not because the public demanded them but because gasoline was cheap and the profit margin on these vehicles is much higher than it is for compact cars. Detroit made its bed, and now that gasoline prices are burning through people's wallets, Detroit is whining about having to lie down in it.

Meanwhile, Toyota is eating everyone else's lunch with its 55-mpg Prius hybrid. Of course, Toyota also is building a huge new, gas-guzzling pickup, as well as monster SUVs, which explains why it has thrown in with Detroit on this bill.

But here's the real bottom line: The national security of the United States demands that Americans reduce their dependence on oil, and fuel efficiency is one way to get there. The technology exists, so there's no good reason to relax the standards proposed in the original bill.

Article Tools

 Print Friendly
 
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.