This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2004, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

WASHINGTON - Frustrated federal water quality regulators said the reassignment of the Intermountain section's top official after a run-in with Utah Rep. Rob Bishop was a decision to "feed one of our own to the lions," and could undermine future enforcement activities.

Brooks Carter, who had been chief of the Army Corps of Engineers' Intermountain Regulatory Section for 19 years, was moved into a new regional policy job in late July, amid a dispute with Bishop and the city of Perry over a pair of projects that the corps said violated the Clean Water Act.

The corps said the move was part of a shake-up that had been months in the planning.

Corps regulators saw the move as a politically motivated scapegoating after Brooks enforced the law, according to an outpouring of e-mails to Army officers protesting the decision. The correspondence was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

"I am shocked and dismayed at this action. The justification eludes me," Grady McNure, a regulator in the St. George field office, wrote to Brig. Gen. Joseph Schroedel, commander of the corps division that covers the southwest United States. "After 31 years with the corps, I am at a loss today and very disappointed in my agency."

Perry has been trying for months to win approval from the corps to pave a road leading to a Wal-Mart and to build a new sewage lagoon. The corps said that the city's proposals would destroy wetlands used by migratory birds along the Great Salt Lake.

The city and its advisers, Lone Goose Consultants, argued the road project would not harm any federal wetlands. And, they said, the water in the sewage lagoon could replace the bird habitat.

The Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency and state Division of Wildlife Resources all disagreed, saying the sewage could actually harm the waterfowl.

So Perry turned to Bishop, who, along with his staff, pressed the corps to permit the project.

In a June 23 memo, Carter wrote that Bishop's senior legislative assistant, Justin Harding, left a voice mail message saying that Bishop was going to take care of me if Carter didn't leave Perry residents alone, according to documents received earlier this month.

An internal review by the corps of how Carter's office had handled the Perry issue said that, apart from some paperwork problems, it had acted appropriately and actually had been too lenient. It blamed Lone Goose Consultants for much of the friction.

However, in a conference call on July 21, corps staff was told that Carter was being reassigned - a lateral move to a policy position where he would have no regulatory authority. His staff responded with numerous e-mails to Schroedel.

"I am shocked and ashamed that the only recourse to Lone Goose and Congressman Bishop's incessant [complaints] regarding the regulatory program and the Clean Water Act itself is to feed one of our own to the lions," wrote Anna Sutton, a project manager in the Utah office.

"Not only does the current plan have personal ramifications to our friend and supervisor, but the integrity of the Regulatory Program is at risk," wrote Susan Bachini Nall in an e-mail signed by the staff in the Grand Junction office.

"What assurances do we have that the corps leadership will support us on legally defensible permit actions?" asked Nancy Kang, a Utah regulator.

In an effort to stem the revolt, Andrew Rosenau, chief of the regulatory branch in Sacramento, said he regretted that the purpose for the move - to put Carter in a position where he can help improve the permitting process regionwide - wasn't more clearly articulated.

Carter said in an e-mail to his staff that he personally had become too closely associated in applicants' eyes with the decisions made by the office. His departure, he said, would help focus debates on science and the law rather than on him personally. Besides, his new office would be just a few miles from his home, so he could ride his bike to work more often.

In a recent interview, Carter said Bishop's intervention likely was partly behind the decision to move him out of the regulatory post, but he said it is impossible to say how much of a role it played.